ID-10057480A friend and wonderful writer, Lee Cox, just sent me a link to an interesting article appearing August 4, 2013 on CNN.com, The Man Who Turned Rejection Into a Career. I read it with interest (as should you) because in it, CNN contributor Bob Greene tells the story of Chuck Ross, who had a mystery novel turned down (and subsequently became a successful editor).

The story goes that as an experiment, Ross retyped someone else’s award-winning novel and submitted it to 14 major publishers and 13 top agents. “Every publisher and every agent turned it down. None recognized that they were rejecting a book that had already been a bestseller and had already won the National Book Award.”

On the heels of the whole Robert Galbraith a.k.a. JK Rowling saga, such stories have become rampant. Indeed, JK Rowling herself was rejected for Harry Potter plenty before a publisher decided to take a chance on her work. So was John Grisham for A Time to Kill. So was David Wroblewski for The Life of Edgar Sawtelle. And so were countless of other now-published authors. I could fill lots of cyberspace with all the examples, but it turns out there’s a whole site devoted to that… read on!

But I have a question: What if someone had expressed interest in Chuck Ross’s retyped version of Steps by Jerzy Kosinski? Would that have created interest in Ross’s mystery novel with the folks who’d turned it down? I’m guessing not.

Here’s the real deal, folks (and any agent worth his or her salt will concur): Your manuscript getting rejected needn’t be about you feeling rejected as a writer. It may not even be about the quality of your work or your compelling plot. Why?

ID-10067173First, because books are wildly, incredibly, unbelievably subjective pieces of art. If you belong to a book club, you know this. Five people meeting about the same book they’ve each just read may have five very different opinions. What I may hate, you may love, and vice versa. We agree to disagree. That’s why books get talked about – If everyone had the same opinion, why bother?

Second, an agent or publisher has to feel that, even if it’s a stellar book in its own right, it’s also a book they want to champion, and that they have the ability to champion. Some will even admit to passing on books like Dan’s Brown’s The Da Vinci Code, knowing full well it had potential but potential they themselves didn’t feel they’d be able to realize.

I’ve recently run into this fabulous website, www.literaryrejections.com, and on it, besides tons of really cool rejection stories (Kathryn Stockett’s The Help was rejected 60 times!), is plenty of great advice, some fascinating interviews with literary agents, and these words, which I was moved to share:

Literary agents and publishers do not reject you to hurt you. They reject you to improve you.

Write on, tribe… every rejection will bring you a step closer to acceptance. And if you have a rejection story to share, please do. (Misery, especially among authors, loves company…)

ShariStauch Five Tips to Start a Thriving Writers GroupCreator of Where Writers Win, Shari Stauch has been involved in publishing, marketing and PR for 30 years. She is also the principal author of the WWW blog, and speaks at conferences around the country. The Where Writers Win team’s newest collaboration is The Winner Circle – vetted book review directories, book clubs and other cultivated resources for emerging authors.

Graphics courtesy of freedigitalphotos.net

Tagged on:                 

6 thoughts on “How to Handle Rejection: Don’t Give Up!

  • August 5, 2013 at 11:21 am
    Permalink

    I thoroughly enjoyed reading this post because it reminds me how subjective any art form is. So true about book clubs. In the two that I’m in we’ve roundly criticized books that have sold well–not to be cruel, but because we felt elements of the story didn’t ring true or didn’t maintain the suspension of belief necessary to a work or fiction. And movies! How many times have we heard from friends the following: “Don’t waste your money!” “Awful!” “Boring!” Editors and agents have their own tastes, likes and dislikes. I try to remember this when I get a rejection.

    • August 5, 2013 at 12:20 pm
      Permalink

      Without a doubt, Marilyn. So now that you brought it up – have to ask – have you filled out our book club survey about those clubs?! http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/9XWJPNG

  • August 5, 2013 at 10:51 am
    Permalink

    Fantastic! Love the website- www.literaryrejections.com!!!

    • August 5, 2013 at 12:18 pm
      Permalink

      Fun, isn’t it? See, even the best and most successful have been rejected… and OFTEN!

  • August 5, 2013 at 10:45 am
    Permalink

    I like the gist of this article and appreciate the encouraging tone, but disagree with “Literary agents and publishers…reject you to improve you.” If every rejection came with notes as to what a writer could do to improve a piece, sure, that quote works. But more often than not, they’re form rejections – how does that improve a writer’s work? Not that it’s agents/editors’ jobs to provide critique services to authors whose works they’re rejecting; their business is to find, polish, and sell commercially viable writing. To say that a rejection is nothing personal is fair enough, but to suggest that it’s beneficial, just generally, doesn’t ring true for me.

    • August 5, 2013 at 11:03 am
      Permalink

      Thanks for weighing in, Mina. True, some don’t offer up insights, but many do – and if a bunch don’t, in a row, that may also be a sign in itself that the work needs revisiting… or it just needs to sit quiet for a bit before revisiting. One editor we know was herself rejected, at which point she put it up for over a year before digging back in herself and realizing what was missing. Or, in all those cases of popular rejection the “improve” may simply mean to continue submitting until you find the literary agent willing to offer that input or better, willing to champion your work. In which case, perhaps it’s not the writing that’s improved (or even needs improved), but our resolve?

Comments are closed.